RBI permits foreign banks' subsidiary to acquire pvt banks

Mumbai: In a bid to regulate and avoid 2008- type crisis, RBI on Wednesday said foreign banks with complex structures and which do not provide adequate disclosure would have to operate in India only through wholly-owned subsidiaries (WOS).

However, it permitted WOS of overseas banks to acquire private sector banks.

The framework for setting up of WOS by foreign banks in India, released by the Reserve Bank Wednesday night, also allowed foreign banks' subsidiaries to list on local stock exchanges. The initial minimum paid-up equity capital or net worth for a WOS would be Rs 500 crore.

"Banks with complex structures, banks which do not provide adequate disclosure in their home jurisdiction, banks which are not widely held, banks from jurisdictions having legislation giving a preferential claim to depositors of home country in a winding up proceedings, etc, would be mandated entry into India only in the WOS mode," it said.

Foreign banks operating in India before August 2010 have the option to continue their operations in branch model.

The RBI further said foreign bank subsidiary will not be allowed to hold more than 74 percent, the sectoral cap for overall foreign investment, in private banks they may acquire.

"As a locally incorporated bank, the WOSs will be given near national treatment which will enable them to open branches anywhere in the country at par with Indian banks," the RBI guidelines said.

There were 43 foreign banks in India with a network of 333 branches as of March 2013. At present, foreign banks have presence in India only through branches.

The guidelines come against the backdrop of the 2008 global financial crisis, which the RBI said has shown that growing complexity and inter-connectedness of financial institutions have compromised the ability of home and host authorities to cope with the failure of big banks.

"The lessons learn during the crisis lean in favour of domestic incorporation of foreign banks," it said.

Spelling out reasons for subsidiarisation, it said this will create separete legal entities having their own capital base and local board of directors, which will help in better regulatory control.

Also, it would ensure that there is a clear delineation between the assets and liabilities of the domestic bank and those of its foreign parent and clearly provides for ring fenced capital and assets within the host country, RBI said.

Standard Chartered, the largest foreign bank by branch presence in India, has its depository shares trading on the domestic bourses, although it hasn't adopted a subsidiary route here.

Only multinational banks Standard Chartered, HSBC and Citi have more than 30 branches in the country. Although the Royal Bank of Scotland has 31 branches, it is winding down local retail operations.

The RBI's framework, aimed at safe guarding the Indian banking system, comes in the backdrop of collapse of several banks in advanced countries during 2008 global financial crisis.

"The issue of permitting WOS to enter into merger and acquisition transactions with any private sector bank in India subject to the overall investment limit of 74 percent would be considered after a review is made with regard to the extent of penetration of foreign investment in Indian banks and functioning of foreign banks (branch mode and WOS)," it said.

To provide safeguards against the possibility of the Indian banking system being dominated by foreign banks, it said, the framework has certain measures to contain their expansion if the share of foreign banks exceeds a critical size.

RBI will put a stop on further entry of new WOSs of foreign banks or capital infusion, when the capital and reserves of all foreign banks in India exceed 20 percent of the capital and reserves of the entire banking system.

FCNR golden goose: Great returns on borrowed capital

Foreign banks are scrambling to raise dollar deposits from non-resident Indians — even tempting them with loans — to open their foreign currency non-resident (bank), or FCNR (B), deposit accounts in India.

The move comes after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), as part of its efforts to stem the rupee’s depreciation, opened a special window for swapping FCNR (B) dollar funds of three years or more at a concessional rate and offered various other incentives, including cheap dollar-rupee swap rates.

Observers say this has offered Indians residing abroad an opportunity to increase their income manifold using borrowed capital.

The process, as bankers and market participants explains, begins with a foreign bank requesting a non-resident to open a FCNR (B) deposit account with its India unit. The bank immediately offers the customer a loan against this deposit. The customer uses the loan to create another FCNR (B) deposit account, against which he is again given a loan. The process is repeated eight to 10 times. The customer benefits as he earns more interest on FCNR (B) deposits than he pays on loans against those.

Some of the Indian banks with foreign branches have also approached their non-resident customers to raise FCNR (B) deposits, but observers say these lenders are not as aggressive as their foreign rivals.

Industry analysts say, using this mechanism, non-resident Indians (NRIs) can make a net return that is significantly higher than the interest rates offered on deposits in developed markets like the US. The returns would easily lure NRIs. According to some estimates, by putting up just 10 per cent of the deposits, the client effectively makes between 18 and 21 per cent on the dollars.

The process, however, has raised concerns of systemic risk.

“The 2008-09 crisis was triggered by over-leveraging. We are again seeing foreign banks encouraging leveraging. There are reports that lenders are offering NRIs upfront loans against FCNR (B) deposits and repeating the process. Such leveraged money can leave as abruptly as it comes in, thereby increasing systemic risk,” Ajit Ranade, chief economist of Aditya Birla Group, says.
 On September 4, 2013, in an almost desperate move to arrest the slide the rupee, RBI had announced a window for swapping FCNR (B) dollar funds, mobilised for a period of at least three years, at a fixed rate of 3.5 per cent a year for the duration of the deposit. The scheme, the central bank had said, would remain operational until November 30, 2013.

In other words, the banking regulator is now permitting lenders to convert three-year FCNR (B) dollar deposits into rupees at 3.5 per cent, even though the swap cost, considering the recent rupee-dollar forward rates, is estimated to be more than six per cent. This has encouraged banks to mobilise FCNR (B) dollar deposits, as they can reduce their cost of fund by at least 250 basis points using this window.

“It is a win-win situation for all. The interest rates offered to non-residents on three-year FCNR (B) deposits in India are significantly more than the current dollar swap rate of 80 basis points a year for a comparable tenure. Banks will benefit, as they will have access to low-cost funds. And, ultimately, this will increase dollar flows into India,” Param Sarma, director and chief executive of NSP Treasury Risk Management Services, says.

Market participants expect banks to bring in over $10 billion through this route which will probably avoid the need for an immediate sovereign bond issue by the government.

“The swap window was necessitated by a sharp depreciation in the rupee and need to bridge the current account gap. There was a need for one large chunk of dollar inflow, which probably led to the introduction of this scheme. However, it is a subsidy, assuming the rupee-dollar swap cost is currently over six per cent. This subsidy will have to be borne by the country,” says Mecklai Financial Deputy CEO Partha Bhattacharyya.

Some industry analysts believe the subsidy burden on Indian taxpayers because of this move might be as high as Rs 2,000 crore a year, assuming banks bring in $10 billion of FCNR (B) deposits.

“We discontinued FCNR (A) deposits since we did not want to bear the entire currency risk, and these deposits also violated IMF (International Monetary Fund) conditions. But by allowing swap at a concessional rate of 3.5 per cent for FCNR (B), we are going back to the FCNR (A) regime, at least partly. I believe, we should be explicit in saying what would be the estimated cost of this subsidy, since the deposits might run up to five years,” Ranade adds.