Syria accepted a
Russian proposal on Tuesday to give up chemical weapons but U.S.
President Barack Obama said it was too early to tell if the initiative
would succeed and he vowed to keep military forces at the ready to
strike if diplomacy fails.
In a televised address to
Americans, Obama pledged to explore Russia's proposal for Syria to place
its chemical weapons under international control, while expressing
skepticism about the initiative.
He
said he had asked the U.S. Congress to postpone a vote on authorizing
military action while Washington and its allies try to pass a United
Nations resolution requiring Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to give up
the weapons in a verifiable way.
In
a sign of how hard that will be, Russian President Vladimir Putin said
earlier that the chemical weapons plan would only succeed if Washington
and its allies rule out military action.
In
what amounted to the most explicit, high-level admission by Syria that
it has chemical weapons, Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem said in a
statement shown on Russian state television that Damascus was committed
to the Russian initiative.
"We want
to join the convention on the prohibition of chemical weapons. We are
ready to observe our obligations in accordance with that convention,
including providing all information about these weapons," Moualem said.
"We
are ready to declare the location of the chemical weapons, stop
production of the chemical weapons, and show these (production)
facilities to representatives of Russia and other United Nations member
states," he said.
Obama said there
had been "encouraging signs" in recent days, in part because of the U.S.
threat of military action to punish Assad for what Washington says was
the use of poison gas to kill 1,400 civilians in Damascus on August 21.
"It
is too early to tell whether this offer will succeed," Obama said. "And
any agreement must verify that the Assad regime keeps its commitments.
But this initiative has the potential to remove the threat of chemical
weapons without the use of force."
Moscow
has previously vetoed three U.N. Security Council resolutions that
would have condemned the Syrian government over the conflict.
The
latest proposal "can work only if we hear that the American side and
all those who support the United States in this sense reject the use of
force," Putin said in televised remarks.
Obama
said he was sending Secretary of State John Kerry to meet Russian
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva on Thursday for further talks,
and he himself would continue discussions with Putin.
Amid
the whirlwind of diplomatic activity focused on the response to the
chemical weapons attack, the civil war resumed in earnest on Tuesday
with Assad's jets again bombing rebel positions in the capital.
UNITED NATIONS
An
initial U.N. Security Council resolution, drafted by France, would
demand that Syria make a complete declaration of its chemical weapons
program within 15 days and immediately open all related sites to U.N.
inspectors or face possible punitive measures.
The
French draft resolution, seen by Reuters, adds that the Security
Council would intend "in the event of non-compliance by the Syrian
authorities with the provisions of this resolution ... to adopt further
necessary measures under Chapter VII" of the U.N. Charter.
Chapter
7 of the U.N. Charter covers the 15-nation Security Council's power to
take steps ranging from sanctions to military interventions. It is the
reference to Chapter 7, U.N. diplomats say, that has made Russia
reluctant to support the initial French draft.
Russia
has made clear it wanted to take the lead on any resolution. Lavrov
told his French counterpart that Moscow would propose a U.N. draft
declaration, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Obama
said he would work with allies as well as Russia and China, both of
which have veto powers on the Security Council, to craft a U.N.
resolution. He gave no timetable for how long he would wait for such
talks to play out.
"Meanwhile, I've
ordered our military to maintain their current posture to keep the
pressure on Assad and to be in a position to respond if diplomacy
fails," Obama said.
The president
also reiterated his arguments for why it would be in the national
security interests of the United States to punish Syria for using
chemical weapons if diplomacy fails.
"If
we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using
chemical weapons," Obama said. "As the ban against these weapons erodes,
other tyrants will have no reason to think twice about acquiring poison
gas and using them."
PUTIN: "NO THREAT OF FORCE"
The
United States and France had been poised to launch missile strikes to
punish Assad's forces, which they blame for the chemical weapons attack.
Syria denies it was responsible and, with the backing of Moscow, blames
rebels for staging the attacks to provoke U.S. intervention.
The
White House said Obama, British Prime Minister David Cameron and French
President Francois Hollande had agreed in a telephone call on their
preference for a diplomatic solution, but that they should continue to
prepare for "a full range of responses."
While
the prospects of a deal remain uncertain, the proposal could provide a
way for Obama to avoid ordering military strikes. Opinion polls show
most Americans are opposed to military intervention in Syria, weary
after more than a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Whether international inspectors can neutralize chemical weapons dumps while war rages in Syria remains open to question.
Western
states believe Syria has a vast undeclared chemical arsenal. Sending
inspectors to destroy it would be hard even in peace and extraordinarily
complicated in the midst of a civil war.
The
two main precedents are ominous: U.N. inspectors dismantled the
chemical arsenal of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in the 1990s but left
enough doubt to provide the basis for a U.S.-led invasion in 2003.
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was rehabilitated by the West after
agreeing to give up his banned weapons, only to be overthrown with NATO
help in 2011.
SYRIAN REBELS DISMAYED
The
Syrian war has already killed more than 100,000 people and driven
millions from their homes. It threatens to spread violence across the
Middle East, with countries endorsing the sectarian divisions that
brought civil war to Lebanon and Iraq.
The
wavering from the West dealt an unquestionable blow to the Syrian
opposition, which had thought it had finally secured military
intervention after pleading for two and a half years for help from
Western leaders who vocally opposed Assad.
The
rebel Syrian National Coalition decried a "political maneuver which
will lead to pointless procrastination and will cause more death and
destruction to the people of Syria."
Assad's
warplanes bombed rebellious districts inside the Damascus city limits
on Tuesday for the first time since the poison gas attacks. Rebels said
the strikes demonstrated that the government had concluded the West had
lost its nerve.
"By sending the
planes back, the regime is sending the message that it no longer feels
international pressure," activist Wasim al-Ahmad said from Mouadamiya,
one of the districts of the capital hit by the chemical attack.
The
Russian proposal "is a cheap trick to buy time for the regime to kill
more and more people," said Sami, a member of the local opposition
coordinating committee in the Damascus suburb of Erbin, also hit by last
month's poison gas attack.
Troops
and pro-Assad militiamen tried to seize the northern district of Barzeh
and the eastern suburb of Deir Salman near Damascus airport,
working-class Sunni Muslim areas where opposition activists and
residents reported street fighting.
Fighter
jets bombed Barzeh three times and pro-Assad militia backed by army
tank fire made a push into the area. Air raids were also reported on the
Western outskirts near Mouadamiya.
However,
Damascenes in pro-Assad areas were grateful for a reprieve from Western
strikes: "Russia is the voice of reason. They know that if a strike
went ahead against Syria, then World War Three - even Armageddon - would
befall Europe and America," said Salwa, a Shi'ite Muslim in the
affluent Malki district.
(Additional
reporting by John Irish in Paris, Louis Charbonneau at the United
Nations, Thomas Grove and Steve Gutterman in Moscow and Steve Holland,
Jeff Mason, Mark Felsenthal, Patricia Zengerle, Arshad Mohammed, Richard
Cowan, Paul Eckert and Roberta Rampton in Washington